Assyrian Weapons and military Technology
Uploaded by ericp o May 31, 2005
The
Assyrian army was feared for many reasons one including the use of iron
in their weapons. The Assyrians were the first to use iron in spears,
swords, shields and armor. They even tipped their battering rams for
extra effectiveness. When the Assyrians first attacked their enemies
with these awesome novelties of war, it caused almost as profound a
reaction as the atom bomb has in our time (Fairservis, 96). Against
iron spears and swords, bronze shields were useless. The Assyrians had
the most advanced weapons of their time. Their arrows were tipped in
iron, the strongest metal of the time. Their bowmen were also among the
worlds finest (Fairservis, 95). They had heavy chariots drawn by two
horses and had a crew of two, the driver and an archer. Later, a third
man was added to protect the rear and a spare horse was hitched at the
rear (Za
Khan). They introduced cavalry and an accurate sling and developed
siege craft with siege towers, battering rams and hand propelled
vehicles with armor protection (Za Khan). The primary weapon of the
infantry was the bow. It was used in groups or individually; a shield
bearer protected the bowman. The bow had a range of over two hundred
and fifty meters. A quiver held fifty arrows and a captain had one
hundred shield bowmen and shield bearers under his command, which
produced formidable firepower (Za Khan). Other weapons used by the
infantry wear the spear, the javelin, slings and swords (Za Khan).
The
cavalry employed horses ridden bareback by two horsemen. One rider held
the reins while the other rider, with a shield on his back, used a bow
or a lance. Because cavalry could be used on uneven ground, it started
replacing the chariot around six hundred B.C (Za Khan).
 
war chariot
The
army also had special technical units. They accompanied the army and
had chariots for the battle field and wagons for transporting necessary
equipment which would include not only the obvious items of rations and
tents but also such specialists types of equipment such as siege
engines and rams (Saggs, 244). When roads had to be cut, a task force
of men equipped with bronze, iron or copper picks and axes would hack a
path for the army to pass through. Not even a river could stop the
well-equipped Assyrians. If the river could not be crossed on foot,
they would construct boats or bridges to cross the river with. The
bridges were most commonly boat bridges, bridges formed by tying a
number of boats together across the river with planks on top to make a
footway or even a road for the chariots to pass over (Saggs, 244).
Other specialists in lesser numbers included scribes for recording
booty and other details of the armies campaign (Sags, 244).
Assyrian warship
Another
weapon used by the Assyrians was not made of wood or iron, but was used
in equal effect was psychological warfare. The Assyrians were masters
of psychological warfare. They believed that it was necessary that
should be persuaded that it was vain to attempt to oppose Assyria. The
Assyrians achieved this in two ways, demonstration of overwhelming
might and by propaganda (Saggs, 248). King Sargon explicitly states
that his victories had a propaganda aspect to them. After his defeat of
the forces of the kingdom of Ururtu and their allies in his major
campaign of 714, he says, “The remainder of the people, who had fled to
save their lives, I let free to glorify the Victory of my lord Ashur.
Some of these poor wretches died from exposure in the mountains, but
others struggled home, where their account of the devastating striking
power of the Assyrian forces struck their hearers dumb.” Other examples
of the tactic of psychological warfare included the palaces of the
kings. In Ashurnasirpal’s palace, scenes of war predominated the walls
only in the room that probably served as an audience chamber to other
kings and guests. It is a reasonable conclusion that this predominance
of war scenes was to reinforce in the minds of visiting rulers and
ambassadors their consciousness of Assyrian military might.

There are
indications that the king insisted on very strict discipline in the
matter of treatment of prisoners-of-war. One royal letter to an
Assyrian administrator dealing with provisions for such prisoners
actually warns the official: “you shall not be negligent. If you are,
you shall die. Where the military action recounted was a matter only of
conquest and not of putting down a rebellion, there is no mention of
mass atrocities; the reference in such cases is only to the taking of
prisoners, with no indication of executions or mutilations (Saggs,
262). Often times, the Assyrian army would deport the people they had
just conquered. The objective was not so much punitive as to benefit
the Assyrian empire both economically and in terms of security (Saggs,
263).
The
Assyrian armies did not only have the best tactics and weapons but were
also the most prepared and organized. Assyria was capable of deploying
forces running into hundreds of thousands of men, but military
activities were not always represented by campaigns on that scale. But
whatever the size of the force, its efficient use depended upon the
twin factors of organization and discipline. The Assyrian grand army
was not simply a horde of bloodthirsty peasants become infantry, backed
by a furious cavalry out for loot. It was in fact a well-organized
force, integrating specialist units of many types (Saggs, 243). At its
core was a standing army. This was necessitated by several types of
duty that had to be performed on a permanent basis. First was the
personal security of the king, which required a permanent bodyguard
(Saggs, 244). The archers came first backed by powerful spearmen and
shielded carriers who fought at close quarters. Then there were the
heavy chariots and the horsemen who attacked with tremendous speed and
power, maneuvering with great skill in compact units through and around
enemy formations (Fairservis, 95). Siege equipment was highly
developed: wheeled rams were drawn up to the walls of a city and with
great blows breaches were smashed through stone and brick (Fairservis,
95). The armies marched on paved roads built by engineers;
well-maintained roads provided a relay communication network that
connected the entire empire (Fields, 88).
The
armies of Assyria had permanent bases called ekal masharti, which
literally means ‘palace of the place for marshalling forces,’ in
effect, ‘barracks’ (Saggs, 251). These building were buildings with
large courtyards for army purposes. They stored weapons, food and
stationed men in these barracks. The whole Assyrian army was not called
out every time there was a battle of fight. The army was composed of
levies raised under provincial governors, and it is found that the
troops of one particular governor amounted to fifteen hundred cavalry
and twenty thousand archers. There were many provinces and a general
call-up across the empire could easily muster up hundred of thousands
of troops (Saggs, 253). While the siege of a city was in operation, the
Assyrian army would set up a fortified camp outside the city, well
defended so that troops off duty could rest. A ring of Assyrian guards
would surround the city to cut off supplies; the almost inevitable
result was that if a city was too strong to be taken by assault, it
would eventually fall from famine (Saggs, 261). The siege form of
Assyrian warfare was highly organized. The Assyrians had wheeled and
armored battering rams, which were wheeled up ramps built of packed
earth and stone to the higher and less thick part of the defending
walls. Sappers would mine tunnels to bring about the collapse of
sections of walls and infantry would scale ladders and siege towers and
surmount the walls to any weakly defended spots (Saggs, 260).
The
Assyrians had one of the most advanced and feared military forces of
all times. They were the most prolific army of their time and changed
how ware would be fought for the rest of time. In the end though, as
all great empires do, they fell and a new dominate empire followed
them. But while they ruling, the Assyrians were the best at what they
did and they will always be remembered as one of the most advanced and
feared empires of the ancient world.
|